Comments on: Top Five Family Animations That Have Caused Controversy

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:36:57 +0000

wow. you need a hobby.

By: Pebbles Jr.

Pebbles Jr. — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:52:23 +0000

I love the irony,a bunch of pervs looking for problems, and after we add the fact that you’ll find somthing if you look hard enough.

By: Katie

Katie — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:48:35 +0000

I’ve watched these movies growing up! you’re making a huge deal out of this, blowing it out of proportion. Never once did I notice any of these things. Interesting facts though…but ridiculous.

By: Miranda

Miranda — Sat, 30 May 2009 01:15:03 +0000

awhh (: it looks like someone has no life !
when i saw the little mermaid ; a penis was no where in my mind when i looked at the cover
so whos the real pervert? why are yuu checking out childrens movies & looking for sexual things ?

By: Rock not Sand

Rock not Sand — Thu, 14 May 2009 03:06:53 +0000

It’s the principle of the matter. What ever happened to living by your principles? Is it a dying art?

The point is we are trusting this company to entertain our kids in an appropriate and acceptable way. This is NOT appropriate or acceptable, regardless of whether we catch it while viewing the movie. Someone who gets their kicks and giggles from putting this “message” into child-marketed entertainment is NOT someone who I want to trust with my kid’s minds. Who cares about the actual image, let’s look at the principle.

By: jghv

jghv — Sun, 03 May 2009 07:02:06 +0000

stupid

By: layni

layni — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:44:37 +0000

i love how everyone is so uptite about sexual ineuendo, or any reference to sex in these movies, but it is practically unheard of nowadays to see a “good” horror movie without any female nudity, or someone having sex. granted these are little kid movies, but they watch horror too. you just don’t make a big fuss out of it if they do see it in horror movies it’s considered “over their heads”. what’s the difference? it’s over their heads in disney movies too.

By: lolipop.

lolipop. — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:40:14 +0000

yeah iv heard about this stuffs before. never seen it till now but i really think its no big deal. like the rescuers thing its one frame and no kid is really going to see that sh*t anyways. i suppose it could be a subliminal message thing. but i think its just some plot for parents to get compensation.

By: Top 20 Current Stumble Vs Reddit Bizarre Articles - Session Magazine

Top 20 Current Stumble Vs Reddit Bizarre Articles - Session Magazine — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:24:03 +0000

[...] SU – Place 20 – Animations That Have Caused Controversy [...]

By: Rich

Rich — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:30:26 +0000

Apart from the Rescuers (and the original cut of the Lion King) most of these are bollocks.
And I imagine there are far more controversial animations than Aladdin, although I always thought the fact that the main character was a thief quoted as saying ‘got to eat to live, got to steal to eat’ was a questionably role model: Get a day-job you lazyass bum! Waiting for a friggin’ genie to do all the hard work…

Oh yeah and Daffy Duck says NITWIT.